Nuclear Waste Issue Halts U.S. Nuclear Reactor Licensing

Nuclear Waste Issue Halts U.S. Nuclear Reactor Licensing

Postby Oscar » Sun Aug 12, 2012 9:07 am

Nuclear Waste Issue Halts U.S. Nuclear Reactor Licensing

QUOTE: "He noted that nuclear waste is highly radioactive, poisonous and deadly."



----- Original Message -----
From: Elaine Hughes
To: Breitkreuz, G. MP ; SK Premier Wall ; ROOT, John-UofS ; Council of Canadians
Cc: WHO ; The Ecologist Magazine ; The Current ; SK Green Leader - Lau, Victor ; SK Watershed Auth. ; SK Party Caucus ; SK NDP Caucus ; Sask Environmental Society ; Sask EcoNetwork ; Safe Drinking Water Foundation ; Safe And Green Energy ; Ralph Goodale, Liberal.ca ; RAE, Bob. Lib. Leader ; MULCAIR, T. NDP Leader ; MAY, E. GPC Leader ; Greenpeace ; Committee for Future Generations ; Coalition for a Clean Green SK ; Ecojustice
Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2012 8:59 AM
Subject: GOOD NEWS!!!!! Nuclear Waste Issue Halts U.S. Nuclear Reactor Licensing



(IPS) Waste Issue Halts U.S. Nuclear Reactor Licensing

By Matthew Cardinale, Atlanta Progressive News, Aug 8 2012

http://tinyurl.com/ctqrged

This article first appeared on the Inter-Press website at:

http://www.ipsnews.net/2012/08/
waste-issue-halts-u-s-nuclear-reactor-licensing/

IPS – Inter Press Service News Agency

ATLANTA, Georgia, Aug 9 2012 (IPS) - The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, which oversees commercial nuclear power enterprises, has halted the issuance of all new nuclear reactor licensing decisions after a court ruling citing the failure of industry and government to identify an acceptable solution for the long-term storage of nuclear waste.

Nineteen final reactor licensing decisions are affected, including nine Construction and Operating Licenses (COLS), eight license renewals, one operating license, and one early site permit.

The NRC issued the order on Tuesday in response to a petition filed by numerous environmental groups, as well as individual petitioners.

The petition followed a ruling by the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit dated Jun. 8, which stated that the way that the NRC deals with nuclear waste issues in its review process for new or existing nuclear power plants is unacceptable.

At issue is something called the Waste Confidence Ruling of the NRC.

“What we call Waste Confidence was an environmental finding by the commission, what we call a generic finding, meaning it applies universally (to all permit applications), that the spent waste, high level fuel can be stored for several decades beyond the life for the reactor,” Dave McIntyre, an NRC spokesman, explained to IPS.

“The US Circuit Court of Appeals… agreed with the challengers and remanded that waste confidence rule to us, and said basically, the main thing is the NRC should have looked at the possibility, what if there is no repository (for the nuclear waste)?” McIntyre said.

“Yucca Mountain (a proposed waste storage site in Nevada) has been cancelled, and there are no plans as of now. What if Congress continues to be divided and the nation doesn’t choose a direction to go and find a different site?” he said.

The NRC rule at issue assumes “(a) the NRC will find a way to dispose of spent reactor fuel to be generated by reactors at some time in the future when it becomes ‘necessary’ and (b) in the meantime, spent fuel can be stored safely at reactor sites,” according to a joint press release from the environmental groups.

“I think this is very significant,” Louis Zeller, executive director of the Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League, told IPS.”It upsets the NRC Commission and the nuclear industry’s apple cart because it’s something they did not expect.

“They expected us to challenge new reactors in Georgia, Alabama, South Carolina, and Virginia, in many of the places we have, but I don’t think they expected one of the foundational tenets of their nuclear paradigm to be upended like this. I think this struck them by surprise.

“I try to be optimistic about these things. I do think it is important enough and at this point the judges of the DC circuit court of appeals have basically agreed – the NRC was whistling past a graveyard on nuclear waste issues,” Zeller said.

He noted that nuclear waste is highly radioactive, poisonous, and deadly.

- - - SNIP - - -

Proposed new reactors impacted by the NRC decision include

Calvert Cliffs in Maryland,

Fermi in Michigan,

William States Lee III in South Carolina,

Grand Gulf in Mississippi,

Victoria County in Texas,

Turkey Point in Florida,

Comanche Peak in Texas,

South Texas in Texas,

Bell Bend in Pennsylvania,

Shearon Harris in North Carolina,

Levy County in Florida,

Bellefonte in Tennessee,

Watts Bar in Tennessee, and

North Anna in Virginia.
Oscar
Site Admin
 
Posts: 9966
Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 3:23 pm

Return to Uranium/Nuclear/Waste

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron