Page 1 of 1

McNamara: Impacts of Peace River Nuclear Proposal

PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 6:20 pm
by Oscar
Impacts of Peace River Nuclear Proposal

by Pat McNamara April 01, 2009

The impact of the proposed Peace River reactors has already been devastating to the Weberville community. People's lives have been turned upside down, people are getting sick and members of the community are fighting among themselves. This situation will continue to get worse as the decision on building the reactors is still four years away.

The community surrounding the proposed site is no longer functioning as it did a few months ago. Neighbours feel betrayed by their friends who have optioned their property to Bruce Power. Neighbours who had worked together and shared equipment no longer speak to each other. Their children were best friends who no longer do anything together.

The most common concern voiced by community members is that their lives have been put on hold. No one wants to undertake improvements to their farms without knowing the fate of the reactors. The value of their land has already started to fall despite Bruce Power's assurances that land values would triple as a result of the project.

About half of the local residents have said they will put a 'for sale' sign up on their property if the reactors go ahead; some are afraid of the dangers from the reactors while others are concerned they will not be able to sell the food they grow. Some farmers have already received the news they dreaded from their buyers. One organic oats grower was told by his buyer that he would not purchase his product if the reactors were built near his farm. A cattle producer was told the same thing about the calves he raises for sale.

Others have not recovered from the shock of the original announcement. They have become depressed and incapacitated from this assault on the way of life they have built for themselves. Several people have had to seek medical treatment as a result. As a father told me: "I've not had a restful sleep since the announcement on Nov. 13. I'm taking tylenol to alleviate the stress headaches from sleep deprivation." A mother responded: "I have not been able to give my family my undivided attention because of the concerns this has on our future. Our teenage son could make people laugh until their sides hurt, now it's like he has no humor in him."

Put yourself in their shoes. Many are already making plans to leave the community. Friendships and family connections which have been nurtured for a lifetime will be severed. People you depended on for help will no longer be nearby. It will not be safe for their children to walk to the neighbours with the traffic from 5000 construction workers on a road that now sees five cars per day. A monetary settlement may be available to pay for the farm but there is no way of compensating people for the quality of life issues which make living here so special.

These "project impacts" will not be included in the environmental assessment for this project. These impacts will not be counted as they cannot attach a dollar value to them, yet they are just as real and damaging as if you had a car accident. How will people be compensated for these losses?

What value do you place on twenty-year friendships?
What value do you place on grandparents living a mile down the road?
What value do you place on knowing the fishing holes?
What value do you place on being able to let your child walk alone to the neighbours?
What value do you place on living in a community so safe that you are able to leave your doors unlocked?
What value do you place on being able to hike, snowmobile or skate on adjacent properties?
What value do you place on a home you feel safe in?

Every family in the Weberville community has already suffered because of the announcement of this project. None of this suffering or loss of community is being taken into account by Bruce Power or the provincial government. Bruce Power dropped a "social bomb" into the middle of the community and then went back to Ontario to let the local people fight it out among themselves and suffer in silence.

Everyone from the children to the elderly are being affected. Plans and lives are changing in a short period of time. The last word will be given to a ten year old girl who lives beside the proposed reactor site. She was told at Bruce Power's public meetings that there was very little extra risk of dying from cancer from living near a reactor. She was also informed that recent cancer studies around reactors showed increased risk. She said: "If I raise my family here, my children may have two times the risk of cancer/leukemia. If it was your child that died of cancer, would that be one too many?

My question: "Why are ten year old children worrying about nuclear contamination in a farming community in Northern Alberta"

Pat McNamara
entwork@hotmail.com

"Pat McNamara is a former resident of Port Hope now living in Grande Prairie Alberta"

False Advertising by Bruce Power

PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 12:44 pm
by Oscar
False Advertising by Bruce Power

From: Ent Work
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 11:09 PM

False Advertising by Bruce Power

Bruce Power erected large billboards in Edmonton, Calgary, Grande Prairie and Peace River which read: "Exploring opportunities for growth in Alberta. Next generation nuclear. Hydrogen. Wind. Solar." Bruce Power’s radio ads also stated their intentions to develop hydrogen, wind and solar.

Yet, despite their constant assurance in their advertisements that all of the energy sources would be in the mix of their Peace River "energy hub", there is no evidence of any solar or wind energy projects on the drawing board.

When Bruce Power spokesperson Albert Cooper was asked for information about their solar and wind projects, he responded (by e-mail): "As we do the EA (environmental assessment) it will help us decide what the capacity for wind and solar are in this area. Once we have this information, we will be able to plan accordingly."

Mr. Cooper’s answer didn’t make sense as the EA would only be about the nuclear reactors. Bruce Power’s Communications Co-ordinator Judi Chambers was asked about it and she replied by e-mail: "We are supportive of the potential of wind and solar. However, when we begin our Environmental Assessment, it will be for nuclear technology only."

Why did Albert Cooper write that solar and wind would be considered in the EA while Judi Chambers said they would not be considered? Which one of them is telling the truth?

A person living near the proposed reactor site submitted a list of questions to Albert Cooper on March 26, 2009, including one about Bruce Power’s plans for solar and wind projects. On June 17, 2009, Albert Cooper finally replied in writing: "Research into alternative energy supplies will continue and, as an energy company, Bruce Power will look to utilize the results. However, until a more reliable, cost-effective approach to sustained energy production is developed, Bruce Power will continue with what we feel to be the best option available today."

In other words, Bruce Power has no plans to build electricity generating facilities using wind or solar. They only included wind and solar in their advertising campaign to put a green spin on a dirty and expensive technology; kind of like putting "green lipstick on a nuclear pig".

Bruce Power is using the same slogan in Saskatchewan and in Southern Ontario. No wind or solar projects have been announced in either of those province. This is false advertising and it should be discontinued. This charade has gone on long enough.

Pat McNamara
Grande Prairie, AB