AREVA - KIGGAVIK Project at Baker Lake

AREVA - KIGGAVIK Project at Baker Lake

Postby Oscar » Tue May 12, 2015 9:07 am

French transnational seeks open-pit uranium mine near Baker Lake

[ http://canadians.org/blog/french-transn ... baker-lake ]

May 10, 2015 - 8:35am

The French corporation Areva is planning to build the Kiggavik uranium mine near Baker Lake in Nunavut.

The Canadian Press reports, "The $2.1-billion project called for one underground and four open-pit mines just west of Baker Lake... [It would also be near] the calving grounds for one of the North's great caribou herds and near the largest and most remote wildlife sanctuary on the continent. Areva's plans would have emptied part of a lake, built a road through the caribou habitat and stretched a bridge across a Canadian heritage river. Planes loaded with radioactive concentrate would take off from its airstrip."
[ http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/are ... -1.3065910 ]

A Nunatsiaq article further specifies, "Under Areva’s proposal, the project would span two properties about 80 kilometres west of Baker Lake, encompassing five pits, a mill, a 20-km road and an airstrip to transport yellowcake by air to Saskatchewan for processing."
[ http://www.nunatsiaqonline.ca/stories/a ... inal_push/ ]

For now, the Nunavut Impact Review Board has recommended against allowing the mine to proceed given the project lacks a development schedule, but is open to the Paris-based corporation applying again once it has set a start date. The board says that it could then assess the impact the mine would have on caribou, fish and other marine life. The article adds, "The review board's final report further recommends there be more information on caribou and marine wildlife trends. It also called for more education programs that could enable Inuit to qualify for mine jobs beyond entry level positions."

That said, the board's report now goes to the pro-mining Harper government which could reject the report and ask the board to attach conditions to the approval of the mine. It's worth noting that in November 2013 Reuters reported, "Canada has agreed to waive for European companies a longstanding requirement that buyers take on a Canadian partner in uranium mines, a move that may spur greater investment in developing the country's rich uranium reserves." [ http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/10/ ... RS20131018 ] The news agency notes this concession by Harper to the uranium mining industry came after intense lobbying by Areva.

Dr. Gordon Edwards has noted that Inuit residents voted for a moratorium on uranium mining in 1989, but after Nunavut became a self-governing territory the moratorium was overturned by Nunavut Tunngavik, Inc, the land claims administration for the territory. [ http://www.pressenza.com/2015/05/canada ... g-project/ ]
The Council of Canadians also calls for a ban on all uranium exploration and mining, strengthening of legislation to ensure that any exploration or mining of other materials does not disturb or uncover uranium deposits, and fair just transition programs for all communities and workers involved in the uranium mining industry.
[ http://canadians.org/blog/council-canad ... -symposium ]

We note too that if the Canada-European Union Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) were ratified, European transnational corporations could have the investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) provision and other disciplines to challenge a rejection of - or even public consultation on - mining projects like this one. For example, the company developing the Matoush uranium mine in the Otish Mountains in Quebec threatened in 2013 to use the Chapter 11 investor-state clause of the North American Free Trade Agreement to challenge the delay of an 18-month public consultation on the mine. [ http://canadians.org/blog/nafta-challen ... ine-quebec ]

For more on our campaign against CETA, please click here:
[ http://canadians.org/ceta ]

Brent Patterson's blog
Political Director of the Council of Canadians
[ http://canadians.org/blogs/brent-patterson ]

= = = = = = =

Saskatchewan Dene group wants more consultation on Areva's Kiggavik project

[ http://www.nunatsiaqonline.ca/stories/a ... evas_kigg/ ]

Sarah Rogers, Nunatsiaq Online.com - February 6, 2014

[ http://www.nunatsiaqonline.ca/ ]

Project proposes flying uranium to northern Saskatchewan

Athabasca Dene in northern Saskatchewan say they have not been properly consulted on Areva's Kiggavik uranium project near Baker Lake. Although the Kiggavik site is hundreds of kilometres away from their traditional lands, the Athabasca Dene oppose the proposed transportation of milled uranium - known as yellowcake - by plane from the mine to northern Saskatchewan.

Areva proposes to fly some 5,000 tonnes of yellowcake each year to Points North, Saskatchewan, where it would then be transported by truck or train.

In December 2013, the Athabasca Denesuline Né Né Land Corp., which represents First Nations in Black Lake, Fond du Lac and Hatchet Lake, passed a resolution opposing the transport of uranium over their territory.

- - - - SNIP - -

The company’s proposed infrastructure also includes a landing strip, worker accommodation, access roads to Baker Lake and between the two mine sites, and a dock and storage facility at Baker Lake.

Areva toured the region last fall in its final round of community consultations before it drafts a final environmental impact statement, due Sept. 2014.

[ http://www.nunatsiaqonline.ca/stories/a ... fore_feis/ ]

The mine could be in production by 2020.
Oscar
Site Admin
 
Posts: 9966
Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 3:23 pm

Return to Uranium/Nuclear/Waste

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests