Uncomfortable Questions in the Wake of Nuclear Accidents at

Uncomfortable Questions in the Wake of Nuclear Accidents at

Postby Oscar » Mon Apr 08, 2013 9:34 am

Uncomfortable Questions in the Wake of Nuclear Accidents at Fukushima and Chernobyl

http://japanfocus.org/-Timothy-A__Mouss ... dium=email


The Asia-Pacific Journal, Volume 11, Issue No. 13, No. 1, April 1, 2013.

Anders Pape Møller and Timothy A. Mousseau

Twenty nuclear accidents at the official International Nuclear Event Scale of 4 to 7 have occurred between 1952 and 2011 (Lelieveld et al. 2012). The risk of another major accident during the next 50 years is high and it has been estimated that some 30 million people could be directly affected by such an accident (Lelieveld et al. 2012). The highest risks occur around major metropolises such as New York, Washington, Atlanta, Toronto, Western Europe, Shanghai, Hong Kong, and Tokyo and Osaka. The lessons that have emerged from Chernobyl and Fukushima reveal a range of serious questions that must be answered appropriately, above all for the sake of citizens, but also for the credibility of the nuclear industry, and for framing the ongoing debate over energy alternatives. Because recent models suggest that more than half of released radioactive material from a nuclear disaster would be transported more than 1000 km from the site of release (Lelieveld et al. 2012), these questions are important even for citizens in distant countries. It is in this spirit that we have produced a list of unpleasant questions that have been a cause of concern since we first started conducting research at Chernobyl in 1992, and have grown in urgency since conducting research at Fukushima beginning in 2011.

MORE:

http://japanfocus.org/-Timothy-A__Mouss ... dium=email
Oscar
Site Admin
 
Posts: 9966
Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 3:23 pm

Return to Uranium/Nuclear/Waste

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron